Archive for October, 2005

A lot of effort for not much payoff — but who cares?

I went to a casino with my mom today — one that I haven’t been to in a while (she’s never been there). It was fun in a way that is hard to describe if you’ve never won at a slot machine, or if you think that slot machines are a stupid way to throw away money. They’re a fun way to throw money away, kind of like golfing without all the gear.

Not that we won. Or rather, we won lots, but not more than we spent. But it was a nice drive on a nice day, and we weren’t in a hurry to get anywhere. The place itself is huge, which surprised Mom since we’ve mostly gone to riverboats, and has quite beautiful architecture. And thankfully, it’s not too awfully smoky. Much better than the riverboats; I just want to burn my clothes after I’ve been to one of those.

Slot machines change rather rapidly — they’ve long since stopped being a “one-armed bandit,” though they still have functional arms for those people that want that experience. The casino had multi-denomination slots where you could choose your credit value — between each spin, if you’d like. There were video slots, reel slots, reels that had video, and videos that simulated reels. And then there are the video poker machines, but we don’t play those usually.

Depending on the machine, you could bet anywhere from 1 to 21 lines, and from 1 to 20 credits per line. Usually the higher denomination machines allow you to risk fewer credits (not necessarily less money), but I did see a multi-denomination machine that allowed one to play $45 a spin. If you’re going to do that, you’d be better off at the high-limit machines (where you can bet $5 or more per credit).

Slot machines also have themes like “Bucks Ahoy” or “Filthy Rich.” Media tie-ins are also quite popular. The most popular is probably “Wheel of Fortune” which is in it’s 4th edition, I think, and right now “I Dream of Jeannie” seems to be quite the thing. Last year it was all “Austin Powers” but I didn’t see a single machine today. However, it may just be that I was at a different casino. Most people pick the video machines (in a given price category) because of their theme or their bonus round. Bonus rounds are where the real money is won, since the payouts for regular spins are usually negative (you might bet 27 and “win” 15).

The casinos and the slot machine producers work very hard to make machines attractive to a wide variety of people. Some only play the single-line reels (which I do when I want to bet higher than a nickel/credit). Some only want to play the penny machines, so a $20 bill goes a seemingly long way (however you’re encouraged to play 21 lines and 10 credits/line). Some people like to handle the coins and play only those machines that pay in cash, and others like clean hands and only play the machines that use vouchers. I find I prefer vouchers if I’m winning and coins if I’m losing.

The casino’s idea seems to work. There were mostly retirees, there, of course, since it’s mid-week, but none of those sad people you sometimes see on TV, sitting in a wheelchair wearing an oxygen cannula and straining for the spin arm. No, this is (on Thursday morning, at least) a casino that attracts yuppies — or whatever passes for same in the retiree set.

The most fun people to watch are the superstitious ones. The people (mainly women) who trace the line of the winning symbols that didn’t come up (”only that one seven and I coulda had it!”). The ones who cash out after every win, and then take from their pile to feed the machine again. The ones that very carefully choose the looonng way to place their bets instead of hitting the “same bet” button. I saw one man today very carefully bring both his hands down on the spin button, like he was performing the ritual insertion of the knife into the sacrificee.

Wow, this is long and not very well-organized. Kinda like my day. Gosh, it was fun!

 

Zombies!


Hannah shows the depths of her Dawn of the Dead obsession.

Thanks to James

 

Just over 50%. Is that good?

What I’ve seen (in bold) from Scalzi’s “50 Canonical SF Movies list”

  • The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension!
  • Akira
  • Alien
  • Aliens
  • Alphaville
  • Back to the Future
  • Blade Runner
  • Brazil
  • Bride of Frankenstein
  • Brother From Another Planet
  • A Clockwork Orange
  • Close Encounters of the Third Kind
  • Contact
  • The Damned
  • Destination Moon
  • The Day The Earth Stood Still
  • Delicatessen
  • Escape From New York
  • ET: The Extraterrestrial
  • Flash Gordon: Space Soldiers (serial)
  • The Fly (1985 version)
  • Forbidden Planet
  • Ghost in the Shell
  • Gojira/Godzilla
  • The Incredibles
  • Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956 version)
  • Jurassic Park
  • Mad Max 2/The Road Warrior
  • The Matrix
  • Metropolis
  • On the Beach
  • Planet of the Apes (1968 version)
  • Robocop
  • Sleeper
  • Solaris (1972 version)
  • Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
  • Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope
  • Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back
  • The Stepford Wives
  • Superman
  • Terminator 2: Judgement Day
  • The Thing From Another World
  • Things to Come
  • Tron
  • 12 Monkeys
  • 28 Days Later
  • 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea
  • 2001: A Space Odyssey
  • La Voyage Dans la Lune
  • War of the Worlds (1953 version)

There are a few that I’ve seen bits and pieces of (Alien/Aliens, for instance), but not enough to count (though I’m familiar with all the “hey look at this!” bits).

Of course, now I’ve got to go find out just why Scalzi thinks Buckaroo Bonzai is canonical. I love the movie, sure (and know a few BB wannabees), but canonical?

(via The Little Professor)

 

I can guess your PIN in 4 notes

While checking out at Kroger the other day, I swiped my bank card in the reader, entered my PIN, and stopped… staring at the keypad.

The keys on the keypad have obvious signs of use (not unlike my iBook keyboard, which is missing the text from some letters, but that’s for another time). Most worn were the 1-2-3-4 keys, with 7 also showing a largish amount of use, but not as much as the others. 5-6-8-9-0 were much, much less used.

I’m sure there’s some permutations geek (and I love you, really! geek is cool these days), could tell me what percentage of all available 4-digit PINs are in those four numbers. And then develop some sort of parlour trick, like the “same birthday” one that always seems to amaze people in a largish group.

 

Cooking for how many?

I’m pretty good with revamping leftovers. Sometimes I’ll just reheat and eat, but I will more often try to do something with what’s in the fridge.

Unfortunately, it doesn’t always work out as I planned. Take tonight, for instance. Leftover roast beef, some sad celery and carrots, and some old noodles got some cookin’ and other stuff on hand (broth, for instance) and became beef noodle soup. (I was trying for something not quite so wet, but there it was, and it was… damp.) Got rid of some stuff that’d been hanging around in the fridge for far too long.

But the extra damposity caused a problem. Now I have leftover soup, which I have to figure out how to use. Maybe a casserole?

Sounds like one of those “heritage” bread starters — you know, the one that got started a hundred and fifty years ago, and still is the same stuff? Only with new flour and water added as needed, of course. And in a new bowl every so often. But it’s still the same stuff. As is this damned roasted beef.